21 December 2010
On 13 December 2010, the government announced that it was
withdrawing the Code of Practice in Workforce Matters in Public
Sector Service Contracts (the "Code") with immediate effect. The
Code was introduced first in March 2005, in order to apply the
principles set out in the “Cabinet Office Statement of Practice on
Staff Transfers in the Public Sector”, sometimes known as
COSOP.
What did the Code require?
The Code
applied to public sector service contracts which involved a
transfer of staff from the public sector organisation to the
service provider, or in which staff originally transferred out from
the public sector organisation as a result of an outsourcing were
TUPE transferred to a new provider under a retender of a contract.
The Code formed part of the service specification and conditions
for all such contracts, except those where the Best Value Code of
Practice on Workforce Matters in Local Authority Service Contracts
applied.
The Code was designed to prevent the emergence of a two-tier workforce when public sector employees are contracted out to a new service provider. New recruits (i.e. those subsequently employed directly by the contactor) were to receive comparable treatment to the transferred staff, whose terms and conditions are protected by the TUPE Regulations.
Why was the Code withdrawn?
The government
press release accompanying the announcement stated:
“Removal of the Code will help enable SMEs, mutuals, co-operatives, charities and social enterprises to enter the public sector market and have a much greater involvement in the running of public services and is designed to facilitate greater competitiveness and to drive value for money for the taxpayer.”
What is the effect of the withdrawal of the
Code?
The Code’s withdrawal does not impact on
existing TUPE regulations and provisions in the Employment Act
2008. Neither does it reduce or remove the statutory duties on
public authorities to have due regard to the need to eliminate
unlawful discrimination and promote equality of opportunity, which
can apply to contracting authorities and to suppliers in some
circumstances. The government statement accompanying the withdrawal
states:
“Where contracts are renegotiated and any provisions giving effect to the Code are removed as part of the renegotiation, the changes will apply only to future new entrants. Existing employees’ terms and conditions will be unchanged.
"Where contracts that have previously applied the Code are being re-competed (resulting in a new contract), the Code will not be invoked upon award of the contract.
"When existing contracts which have invoked the Code are being extended, the Code will continue to apply where adherence to the Code is included in the terms and conditions of the original contract, unless both parties agree otherwise.”
What has replaced the Code?
The government
wants to encourage and safeguard good employment practice. In order
to achieve this aim, the Cabinet Office has published a set of
voluntary Principles of Good Employment Practice that have been
developed in discussion with trade unions, suppliers and public
service employer organisations (“Principle of Good Employment
Practice: a statement of principles that reflect good employment
practice for Government, Contracting Authorities and
Suppliers”).
Click here to access these principles >>>
Voluntary principles
There is no
obligation on suppliers to implement these principles to their
contracts. The government wants contracts to be awarded on the
basis of value for money and not on the basis of who signs up to
the principles. Whilst these principles do not form part of the
procurement process, government hopes that suppliers will work with
departments to apply the principles where appropriate.
Comment
Clearly the effect of this is
likely to be that there will be greater flexibility for contractors
to move away from the national terms and conditions of employment
that public sector bodies commonly apply.
Hill Dickinson has a wealth of experience in dealing with the full
range of employment and pensions issues. If you have any queries
relating to the above, or any other legal matter, please do not
hesitate to contact us
for advice.



