Key takeaways
Governance focus intensifies around gambling sponsorship arrangements
Gambling sponsorship is increasingly scrutinised through a governance and regulatory lens.
Compliance questions emerging from unlicensed betting partnerships
Unlicensed betting partnerships raise compliance and risk questions for clubs.
Independent Football Regulator expected to shape future sponsorship standards
New football regulator likely to shape future sponsorship standards.
Background: gambling sponsorship and English football
Gambling sponsorship has long been embedded in English football. In the Premier League, betting brands provide significant revenue through shirt partnerships, stadium advertising and digital campaigns.
More recently, attention has shifted from volume to the nature of these arrangements, particularly as regulatory scrutiny has increased. In particular, questions have arisen around clubs entering into commercial relationships with overseas betting operators that do not hold a licence from the UK Gambling Commission, but whose brands remain visible across UK broadcasts and matchday environments.
In recent months, the issue has moved further up the regulatory agenda following industry and stakeholder engagement with the Independent Football Regulator (IFR) as part of its developing licensing framework. That engagement has focused in particular on the treatment of sponsorship income derived from operators that do not hold UK licences. While no formal conclusions have been reached, it has brought greater scrutiny to these arrangements at a critical point in the evolution of football’s regulatory landscape.
Why unlicensed operators have become a live issue
At a basic level, the issue stems from the distinction between UK licensed and overseas licensed operators. Under the Gambling Act 2005, services offered to consumers in Great Britain generally require a UK licence. Where operators are licensed overseas but promoted through Premier League sponsorship, questions arise as to how those arrangements sit within the UK regulatory framework.
For clubs, this creates a more complex environment. Sponsorship agreements remain commercial in nature, but where a sponsor’s underlying activity would be restricted if directed at UK consumers, the focus shifts to governance, due diligence and oversight. These considerations now sit alongside commercial decision making as expectations around compliance and accountability evolve.
Regulatory exposure and governance risk
The central issue for clubs is regulatory exposure.
The IFR’s draft licensing framework includes provisions preventing clubs from accepting revenue connected to serious criminal conduct. How this will be interpreted, and whether it will extend to sponsorship involving unlicensed operators, remains uncertain. Its inclusion indicates a greater focus on the source and nature of commercial income.
Clubs therefore need to consider whether existing or future arrangements could give rise to licensing conditions, regulatory scrutiny or reputational risk as the IFR’s regime becomes established.
The Premier League’s evolving position
Alongside these developments, the Premier League has agreed a voluntary ban on front of shirt gambling sponsorships from the 2026 to 2027 season. While this reflects concerns around visibility, it leaves other forms of promotion such as sleeve branding, pitch side LED boards and digital content largely unaffected, meaning gambling related revenues remain significant.
Clubs may also point to the international reach of Premier League broadcasts, with partnerships often presented as targeting overseas markets. However, as regulatory focus increases, there are signs that the practical effect of these arrangements, particularly where there is clear domestic exposure, is becoming more relevant than how they are characterised in commercial agreements.
The role of the Independent Football Regulator
The IFR represents a significant development in English football governance, with a remit extending beyond financial sustainability to integrity, transparency and public trust.
Gambling sponsorship sits within this broader framework. While the IFR does not determine criminal liability, its licensing powers give it meaningful influence over club behaviour. A stricter approach to income linked to unlicensed operators could require clubs to revisit sponsorship strategies, reassess risk tolerance and consider alternative revenue streams.
Further guidance from the regulator will be an important next step and is likely to be closely monitored across the industry.
A developing issue for clubs and stakeholders
The debate reflects a wider shift that is likely to accelerate as the new regulatory framework takes shape. Decisions once driven primarily by revenue are increasingly shaped by governance standards, regulatory expectations and reputational risk.
For Premier League clubs, the challenge is no longer simply commercial. As the regulatory framework evolves, gambling sponsorship is likely to remain under close scrutiny and may provide an early indication of how the Independent Football Regulator approaches commercial risk in practice.
We regularly advise clients across the sporting sector on governance, regulatory and dispute related issues. If you would welcome guidance, please get in touch.
