Key takeaways
Regulatory reach and precedent under scrutiny
Independent panel ruling may reshape financial regulation across English football.
Confidence in enforcement framework at stake
Consistency and enforceability central to Premier League regulatory credibility.
Wider implications beyond the immediate dispute
Outcome likely to trigger legal, commercial and governance consequences.
Background: what are the ‘115 charges’?
In February 2023, the Premier League charged Manchester City with a wide range of alleged rule breaches, often referred to as the ‘115 charges’. The allegations relate primarily to financial reporting, sponsorship disclosures and regulatory compliance over multiple seasons between 2009 and 2018, together with alleged failures to cooperate fully with Premier League investigations.
The charges arise under the Premier League Rules, which operate as a private contractual framework binding clubs, the League and the Football Association. The alleged breaches include overstating sponsorship revenue, failing to provide accurate financial information, breaching player and manager remuneration rules, and non-compliance with investigatory obligations. Manchester City has consistently denied wrongdoing and has contested the charges in full.
Unlike earlier UEFA Financial Fair Play proceedings, which resulted in sanctions later overturned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the current case is entirely domestic. It is governed by English law and is being conducted through a confidential arbitration process.
Where things stand
An independent commission, appointed under the Premier League’s Judicial Panel framework, concluded a lengthy evidential hearing in late 2024 following multiple procedural delays. The case is understood to have involved extensive financial documentation, expert accounting evidence and detailed legal submissions.
As of spring 2026, no final decision has been published. Neither the Premier League nor Manchester City has indicated when a ruling is expected. While the scale and technical complexity of the proceedings go some way to explaining the delay, the passage of time has increased scrutiny of the League’s enforcement model.
That scrutiny has been sharpened by recent regulatory action taken against other clubs, where sanctions were imposed more quickly. Taken together, these developments have intensified debate around consistency, transparency and confidence in football’s regulatory processes.
What happens next?
Once the commission issues its written decision, a number of procedural steps may follow.
If breaches are upheld, the panel will determine sanctions in accordance with the Premier League Rules. These may include fines, points deductions, disgorgement of revenue or, in theory, exclusion from the competition. There is no fixed tariff, with sanctions assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Both Manchester City and the Premier League have a right of appeal to an independent appeal board. Any appeal would typically focus on legal interpretation, procedural fairness or the proportionality of any sanction imposed, potentially extending the overall timeline.
Although the arbitration process itself does not determine damages claims, the findings could have wider legal consequences. Depending on the outcome, the ruling may also influence related disputes or future regulatory action.
Potential impacts on English football
Regulatory credibility
The proceedings are widely viewed as a test of the Premier League’s ability to enforce its rules consistently, including against its most commercially powerful members. Recent debate around settlements and differing outcomes has placed renewed focus on whether the current framework delivers predictability and fairness in practice. The City decision is likely to be treated as an important reference point.
Financial governance
The ruling may influence how clubs approach sponsorship valuation, owner-linked transactions and financial disclosure. A robust regulatory outcome could encourage a more cautious approach across the game, while a narrower or technical decision may increase pressure for further reform. This takes on added significance as revised financial rules are introduced from the 2026/27 season.
Commercial and legal considerations
The case is being closely monitored by sponsors, lenders, broadcasters and insurers. Prolonged uncertainty, together with the prospect of retrospective sanctions, raises broader questions around risk allocation and governance expectations. These issues will also be relevant as the new Independent Football Regulator establishes its approach to oversight and enforcement.
A case that will shape expectations
Whatever the final verdict, the Manchester City proceedings represent one of the most significant regulatory disputes English football has faced.
The decision will do more than resolve historic allegations. It will influence how financial rules are enforced in practice, how quickly enforcement is expected to move, and how confident stakeholders are in the robustness of football’s governance structures.
We work with clients across the sporting sector on governance, regulatory and dispute-related issues. To find out how we can help, get in touch.
